Click to enter magazine. If you have news or feedback for LXinfo click here
  Home
About Us
Contact Advertising
Lxinfo magazine - Australasia
Advert link

Canberra, ACT: ATSB publishes report into school bus collision

The Australian Transport Safety Bureau (ATSB) has published its report into the collision between a school bus and a train on the Nulla Nulla South Road open active level crossing near Moorine Rock in Western Australia. The accident occurred at about 15.40 after the school bus drove onto, and became stuck on, an excavated section of railway track. There were no injuries as a result of the collision but there was significant damage to the school bus.

The ATSB investigation determined that the collision occurred as a result of the school bus being driven around road closure signs and onto a level crossing worksite where the rails through the intersection were being replaced.
ATSB’s investigation identified the following contributory factors pertinent to the management of risk at level crossings:

  • The rail replacement contractor did not follow a previously established interface process outlined in the Main Roads Western Australia - Traffic Management for Works on Roads Code of Practice. As a result, JHR did not effectively communicate information about the intended work at the level crossing with the affected parties. In addition, JHR did not receive written approval from the Shire of Yilgarn for the closure of the Nulla Nulla South Road level crossing before commencing work
  • Detour signs were not placed in advance of and at the road closure points on Nulla Nulla South Road to redirect and guide road users around the closed level crossing in accordance with Australian Standard AS 1742.3-2009
  • It is likely that the Coordinating Principal did not fully understand the level of authority she had to plan an alternative temporary bus route in accordance with the Transport Assistance for Students Operational Policy Manual and then discuss other route options with the relief bus driver before the driver commenced the afternoon bus service
  • The relief school bus driver was reluctant to deviate from the designated school bus route as she was unfamiliar with the route and branch roads off Nulla Nulla South Road
  • The combination of being unfamiliar with the roads in the area, the absence of detour signs in advance of and at road junctions to redirect traffic flow, and being uncertain of what she may encounter near the level crossing ahead, resulted in the bus driver choosing to drive around the traffic control devices that had been placed primarily to stop the passage of road traffic.
  • The school bus driver failed to observe that the road structure had been completely removed before driving the school bus into the excavation area close to the railway track.

Other safety factors identified by ATSB of relevance to the management of risk at level crossings are:

  • Induction & training of the relief school bus driver had not been carried out in accordance with the Public Transport Authority school bus contractor’s safety management plan
  • The locomotive horn was not activated near the whistle sign located about 370 m before the Nulla Nulla South Road level crossing, contrary to WestNet Rail Network Rule 27

The full report can be found on-line at: www.atsb.gov.au/media/1571302/ro2009005.pdf

(June 30th, 2010)

Melbourne, Victoria: Safety Interface Agreements kick-in on July 1st

From July 1st, 2010, an amendment to the Rail Safety Act 2006 (Vic) requires rail operators (rail infrastructure managers and rolling stock operators) and relevant road managers to have safety interface agreements which identify and assess risks that may arise from operations at level crossings
The new agreements  will replace the current requirement for interface coordination plans that relate to rail operators and other persons at interfaces, and introduce new complementary obligations on both rail operators and road managers.
A safety interface agreement is a joint agreement about managing risks to safety in relation to:

  • Rail/rail interfaces: rail operations of one operator, in relation to rail operations of another operator
  • Rail/public road interfaces: ‘rail or road crossings’ that include any public roadway or public pathway
  • Rail/relevant road interface: ‘rail or road crossings’ that include any other roadway or pathway, such as non-public roads or paths.

Rather than a one-off process, safety interface agreements are intended to be ‘living documents’ that will require ongoing monitoring of risks, including regular audits to ensure that agreed control measures continue to be appropriate.
Safety interface agreements are likely to involve a wide range of parties, such as:

  • Local councils: responsible for most public local roads and footpaths in Victoria
  • VicRoads: responsible for public freeways, major highways, arterial roads and other types of road infrastructure
  • Private road owners: those who own access roads to private properties
  • The Crown: may own non-public roads like access roads in state forests
  • Rail infrastructure managers and rolling stock operators: for example, Metro Trains Melbourne, V/Line or Australian Rail Track Corporation, as well as tourist and heritage operators and private sidings operators.

Public Transport Safety Victoria, the safety regulator has published aguidance document which can be found on-line at: www.ptsv.vic.gov.au/web26/home.nsf/headingpagesdisplay
/legislationrail+safety+legislationsafety+interface+agreements

(June 19th, 2010)

Monash, Victoria: Timetable blamed for exacerbating peak hour delays

A change to the railway timetable is being blamed for increasing the delays suffered by motorists at the Hughesdale and Clayton level crossings in Monash. Increased wait times had been predicted by the Royal Automobile Club of Victoria. The new timetable introduces seven more trains to the peak hour service on the Cranbourne – Pakenham line.

The peak hour closure to road of the Poath Road level crossing in Hughesdale has been increased, according to media reports, to 31 minutes with the barriers lowered for as long as five minutes at a time. At the Clayton Road level crossing the peak hour closure has reached, a more acceptable, 23 minutes.

The situation was only slightly better at the Clayton Rd level crossing, where the gates were down for about 23 minutes of the total hour. The timetable changes have added seven more peak-hour services to the Cranbourne – Pakenham line, which runs through Monash’s level crossings.

There are presently no plans to grade separate either the Poath or Clayton Road level crossings.

(June 15th, 2010)

Kerang, Victoria: Police concerned at continuing abuse of level crossing at which 11 rail passengers were killed

Traffic police in Victoria have concluded a month long initiative straddling the third anniversary of the Kerang accident to identify motorists who fail to use level crossings safely in and around Swan Hill and Kerang. The collision between a truck and a train in June 200 led to 11 fatalities, all of them people who were travelling on the train.

Despite the accident at Kerang, Police have ticketed 22 motorists for offences at the crossing at which 11 people died. A further eight motorists have been ticketed for offences at other level crossing in the north west of the state.

All those who have been ticketed were exceeding the 80kph speed limit at level crossings introduced after the Kerang disaster.

(June 9th, 2010)

Victoria: Third anniversary of Kerang fatal accident highlights backlog of Coronial inquests

The third anniversary of the Kerang level crossing accident in which 11 people were killed is but one of many level crossing accidents going back to 2002 for which a Coroner’s Inquest has still to be held. With a backlog of 29 involving deaths at 15 level crossings, the Victoria State Coroner has a difficult act to balance the rigour of the inquests with concluding them in a reasonable time.

The latest position as a result of a recent directions hearing is that the Kerang Inquests would begin on January 18th, 2011 with consideration of medical response issues. The Inquest will then be adjourned until July 18th, 2011, more than four years after the accident, when truck design issues; railway and road infrastructure issues; and, human factor issues.

The inquest into the Trawalla accident will follow later in 2011 after which the Coroner will move to consider the other accidents involving personal vehicles. However, the Coroner has still to decide which of these will be investigated by “open inquest” rather than procedurally without formal hearings.

A further complication is whether the inquests should be held under the old or new Coroners’ Act which has come into force subsequent to each of the accidents. Coroner invited submissions from the parties regarding the question

(June 7th, 2010)

Victoria: Municipal authorities call for increased funding

Municipal authorities in Victoria are calling for the state government to further increase the funding they provide to address level crossing issues. The latest call is driven by the view that the closure times associated with level crossings in Murrumbeena and Carnegie have become unacceptable. However, the local councils admit ththe there are worse problems at other crossings.

The Victoria Department of Transport position is that the May 2010 budget included AU$1m to study the need for grade separations on the Dandenong rail corridor. However, argue, local authorities argue that this is insufficient if crossings on local roads are also to be addressed.

(June 4th, 2010)

Queensland: Plea for care at cane sugar railway crossings

There are hundreds of passive level crossings on Queensland’s cane sugar hauling railways which are operational on a seasonal basis. Each year the start of the sugar cane harvest and the associated presence of trains on the extensive narrow gauge railway system that serves the industry, catches out motorists who are habituated not to expect a train.

It is in this context that operators of cane sugar railway systems make their plea for motorists to be vigilant at all level crossings and to approach them on the basis that they expect to see a train. Traffic police are working with the cane sugar railways to get across the need to approach level crossing with caution and to cross only when they have established that it is safe so to do.

Motorists also need to understand that level crossing offences are the same regardless of whether it is a core Queensland Rail route or a seasonally operated sugar cane railway. If a AU$300 for failing to drive as required when faced with a level crossing on the “big” railway, it also applies on the “little” railways.

(June 3rd, 2010)

Moorabbin, Victoria: Police could have a field-day with red runners

Police in Moorabbin, Victoria are well aware that there is extensive road user abuse of the North Road level crossing. With multiple offenders each time the level crossing closure sequence initiates, there are plenty of motorists who choose to ignore the requirement to stop when the red flashing lights activate. Indeed a recent exercise identified as many as thirty red runners on a single occasion.

Now that the scale of the issue is abundantly clear there is no excuse that should prevent the taking of converted action to eliminate the temptation to run the red. With a fine of AU$584 for crossing when the red flashing lights are active and legislative provisions which allow for a motor vehicle being seized for this level crossing offence; a high-profile enforcement blitz would go a long way to change behaviours, particularly if repeated randomly several times a year.

(June 1st, 2010)

Back button
      Follow LXinfo on Twitter Click here