| |
 |
|
 |
 |
|
 |
Melbourne, Victoria: VRCSSC considers pedestrian crossing controls
|
Victoria’s Railway Crossing Safety Steering Group (VRCSSC) has considered research looking at pedestrian level crossing controls which have been trialled at the Center Road level crossing in Bentleigh with a view to improve safety and deter crossing the railway illegally.
The approach adopted was to conduct before and after studies looking at each of the technologies trialled to inform VRCSSC making policy decisions for application across Victoria. The technologies trialled were:
- An active another train coming (ATC) sign
- A Red Standing Man (RSM) sign
- Mechanical Emergency Escape Gate Latches (MEEGL)
- Electro-magnetic Emergency Escape Gate Latches (EMEEGL)
Another Train Coming Sign (ATC)
The effectiveness of the ATC was not prominent due to physical restrictions currently in place, which are the automated pedestrian gates and locked emergency escape gates deterring pedestrians from using the railway crossing regardless if there is another train coming or not.
The ATC sign provides additional information to pedestrians when another train is approaching. However, based on the cost benefit analysis performed in the Human Factors Level Crossing Studies commissioned, the initial outlay for this control would be disproportionate to the benefits seen.
Red Standing Man Sign (RSM)
The study found that pedestrians may carry-over the mental model of the RSM sign used at road crossings to cross illegally “because they can when safe” regardless if the wait is short. The carry over of this mental model to the railway crossing would be undesireable. Also at Bentleigh, where the pedestrian gates restrict the crossing, the RSM sign would not provide additional benefit as pedestrians have no where to cross.
At actively controlled pedestrian crossings, the rail infrastructure currently provide sufficient warning to the public of a train approaching and the RSM sign would not significantly improve the safety of the public. Also, the cost of implementation is disproportionate to the benefits
Mechanical Emergency Escape Gate Latches (MEEGL)
The installation of the EEGL was found to reduce illegal crossing and improve the safety at pedestrian crossings. A human factors study recommended that the signage at the EEGL is simplified by removing “emergency from the “emergency exit” signage.
The mechanical latch installed at Bentleigh requires regular labour intensive maintenance to sustain its optimal performance. This was due to the number of moving parts and mechanical complexity. Due to these concerns, it was recommended that an electromagnetic latch be trialled and compared to the mechanical latch to determine the most appropriate latch to be used.
Electromagnetic Emergency Escape Gate Latch (EMEEGL)
|

Emergency Escape Gate, source VRCSSG |
Studies have confirmed that there are advantages in using electro-magnetic emergency escape gate latches rather than the mechanical locking. In particular the EMEEGL reduced the number of occasions on which the emergency escape gate latch was opened from outside (i.e. by people intent on crossing illegally by 96.7%. The EMEEGL has a higher first cost than the MEEGL but greater reliability and substantially reduced maintenance costs than the mechanical alternative. The study concluded that substantially lower costs of installation when an EMEEGL was fitted within a wider crossing upgrade project in which the marginal cost of an EMEEGL was less than AU$28k for two pedestrian gates compared with costs of AU121k when progressed as a free-standing retro-fit to an active level crossing.
In light of the studies outlined above, VRCSSC concluded:
- The ATC sign is not recommended for usage at actively or passively controlled pedestrian crossings.
- The use of the ATC sign referenced in Australian Standard AS1742.7 should be discussed with Australian Standards
- The RSM sign is not recommended for use where pedestrian traffic is actively controlled
- Australian Standard AS 1742.7-2007 should be updated to make the RSM sign optional rather than mandated as at present.
- Emergency Escape Gate Latch exit signs should be simplified to read “exit” rather than “emergency exit”. A walking man symbol should be added along with an arrow indicating the direction to walk to access the refuge
- The EMEEGL should be installed at all future upgrades of pedestrian crossings. When considering retro-fit of the EMEEGL to existing active pedestrian crossings, each location should be risk assessed taking into consideration of the pedestrian volumes and behavioural tendency to illegally cross through the emergency escape path
- The EMEEGL requires a standard configuration to ensure consistency across the network and most importantly for the visually impaired to comprehend the usage of the EMEEGL’s as part of their routine.
For further information, please contact Terry Spicer, chair of VRCSSC at Terry.Spicer@transport.vic.gov.au
(May 31st, 2010) |
|
|
Canberra, ACT: Ecstasy and speed likely cause of collision
|
The Australian Transport Safety Bureau (ATSB) has issued its final report into a collision on a level crossing in which the motorist was under the influence of drugs. The collision between a freight train and a light truck occurred on the Bumbunga level crossing in South Australia. Both the driver of the road vehicle and his passenger were fatally injured.
Toxicology tests conducted on the occupants of the utility vehicle revealed high levels of the drug MDMA (commonly known as ‘Ecstasy’) and Methylamphetamine (commonly known as ‘Ice’, ‘Speed’ or ‘Meth’); both are illicit drugs in Australia. ATSB has concluded that it is likely that the driver of the utility vehicle did not stop at the level crossing as the vehicle occupants failed to perceive and react to the oncoming train due to the effects of the drugs that both the driver and his passenger had taken.
(May 28th, 2010) |
|
|
|
|
Gippsland, Victoria: Track upgrade benefits level crossings too |
Ongoing work to rehabilitate rail infrastructure in the Gippsland area is bringing benefits to level crossing users. In addition to the main focus on the track system, eight level crossings have so far received new roadway surfaces. These works form a part of the AU$25m programme of work funded by the state’s Department of Transport.
(May 23rd, 2010) |
|
|
|
|
Nantawarra, South Australia: Toddler dies while playing on level crossing |
A two-year-old boy was killed while playing on a level crossing in Nantawarra. The accident happened at the Nantawarra Road level crossing on May 22nd, 2010, when the child was playing on his scooter. It has been reported that the toddler had gone missing from his home shortly before the lunchtime accident.
|
|
In August 2009, two people were killed when their car was hit by a train on a level crossing about 5km north of Nantawarra (LXinfo September 2009).
(May 22nd, 2010) |
|
|
Springvale, Victoria: Crackdown follows pedestrian fatality |
The death of an 80-year-old woman on the Springvale level crossing during the afternoon of May 13th, 2010, has led to the police announcing that they will be cracking down on pedestrians who cross under the barriers as was the case in the recent fatal accident.
The elderly woman who was killed, having made her way under the barrier, got her shopping cart trapped in a flange-way gap. She freed her shopping cart and continued to cross into the path of an oncoming train, the driver of which had made an emergency brake application having seen the elderly woman on the tracks. However, this did not avert the accident.
The police crackdown, Operation Patience, began on May 17th, 2010 and will run for two weeks. Level crossings at the Springfield, Noble Park and Yarraman railway stations will be covered by a mix of uniform and plain clothes officers.
|
|
The long-running community campaign to secure a grade-separated alternative to the level crossing on which the elderly woman died is not seen as a cost effective use of scarce public funding because of the constraints around the crossing, including commercial properties that would need to acquired and demolished to create the space for a grade separated solution. This is despite this level crossing having the second highest in Victoria as set out in the state’s priority list one dated May 12th, 2008 which can be found at: http://www.transport.vic.gov.au/DOI/DOIElect.nsf/$UNIDS+for+
Web+Display/241D6E0245C5037BCA257449000820FB/$FILE
/LevelCrossingPriority-20080512.pdf
Rather, a spokesman for Victoria’s Roads and Ports Minister, Tim Pallas, has said the Government’s AU$1m grade separations study would focus on establishing how best to eliminate the level crossings adjacent to Murrumbeena and Caulfield railway stations
(May 17th, 2010) |
|
|
Brighton, Victoria: Crossing closure to be made permanent
|
The New Street level crossing in Brighton, near Melbourne, remained manually operated until an accident in September 2007 when a staff member error left gates across the railway as a prelude to them being hit by a train. This incident led to a decision that the level crossing should be closed on a temporary basis.
Now, a decision has been taken that the New Street level crossing should be permanently closed. This decision announced by Public Transport Minister Martin Pakula has pleased some and angered other residents of the neighbourhood. Additionally, railway historians are concerned that the elimination of the manually controlled gates removes one of the last crossings of this type in Australia.
(May 16th, 2010) |
|
|
|
|
Australia: Federal nation building funds deliver results
|
Australian federal government’s nation building funding of AU$150m allocated to upgrading 292 level crossings, principally from passive or active open status to automatic half-barrier configurations, announced last year is on course to complete in June 2010.
By way of an example lights, bells and barriers have been added to a presently passive level crossing on the Mitchell Highway in Nyngan, New South Wales. These works are costing AU$1.4m from the federally funded AU$42.7m grant to upgrade 55 higher-risk level crossings across New South Wales.
(May 14th, 2010) |
|
|
|
|
Ipswich, Queensland: Teenager survives collision with 70 kph coal train
|
A 19-year-old motorist walked away from a collision in which his car hit the second car of an empty coal train running at 70 kph, The collision occurred on the Lane Road level crossing, in Lanefield, about 25km west of Ipswich during the afternoon of May 6th, 2010.
Witness and police reports have said that the motorist failed to stop at the stop sign at the passive level crossing. The motorist survived because the passing freight train knocked the car away rather than dragged it the 400 metres it took the freight train to stop.
|
|
Local residents have said that they have long-feared a collision because of poor visibility. However, a view attributed to a police source is that the visibility of an approaching train is good and that there are other level crossings where the case for an upgrade is stronger than at this lightly used crossing.
(May 7th, 2010) |
|
|
Kerang, Victoria: Inquest delayed until 2011
|
Inquests into the death of eleven people as a result of the June 2007 collision between a truck and the train on which they were travelling, has been delayed until early next year. The delay is because counsel for VicRoads is not available in September 2009. The inquest will convene on January 18th, 2011 and is expected to last eight days.
(May 6th, 2010) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|